“We don’t think that censorship (including through demonetizing publications) makes the problem go away.”

More than 200 Substack authors asked the platform to explain why it’s “platforming and monetizing Nazis,” and now they have an answer straight from co-founder Hamish McKenzie:

I just want to make it clear that we don’t like Nazis either—we wish no-one held those views. But some people do hold those and other extreme views. Given that, we don’t think that censorship (including through demonetizing publications) makes the problem go away—in fact, it makes it worse.

While McKenzie offers no evidence to back these ideas, this tracks with the company’s previous stance on taking a hands-off approach to moderation. In April, Substack CEO Chris Best appeared on the Decoder podcast and refused to answer moderation questions. “We’re not going to get into specific ‘would you or won’t you’ content moderation questions” over the issue of overt racism being published on the platform, Best said. McKenzie followed up later with a similar statement to the one today, saying “we don’t like or condone bigotry in any form.”

  • gian English
    -11•1 year ago

    The issue is: Once you serve a Nazi in your bar, you become a Nazi bar.

    So if a Nazi buy [a service] then the [service offerer] is a Nazi.

    So every [service offerer] in the world is probably Nazi, since probably every [service offerer] in the world has at least a Nazi customer.

    Interesting approach, now what we should do about all these Nazi [service offerer] ?

    • @affiliateEnglish
      13•1 year ago

      the context of the post is about knowingly serving nazis. this argument does not work in that context.

      • @[email protected]English
        6•1 year ago

        Also about allowing them to congregate on your platform. Nazi bars aren’t just Nazi bars because of who’s in them but also because of who is not in them.

        • @affiliateEnglish
          1•1 year ago

          yeah this is also a good point

      • gian English
        0•1 year ago

        They are also knowingly serving many other categories, so ? They are both democrats and republican, nazis and pro-israel and whatever other “category” uses them to publish artices ?

        • @affiliateEnglish
          7•1 year ago

          this argument is implicitly assuming nazism is “on the same level” as being democrat/republican or any other “category”. this is not the case, so this argument also doesn’t work. do you have any others?

          • gian English
            1•1 year ago

            I don’t said they are on the same level.
            I simply said that if you define a platform as “nazi” because they serve a nazi then you can define the same platform as “whatever” because they serve whatever.

            • @affiliateEnglish
              3•1 year ago

              i can define the color orange by the color of the fruit. i could also define red and blue by the color of that same fruit. not all of these definitions are equally valid