If 100 homeless people were given $750 per month for a year, no questions asked, what would they spend it on?

That question was at the core of a controlled study conducted by a San Francisco-based nonprofit and the USC Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work.

The results were so promising that the researchers decided to publish results after only six months. The answer: food, 36.6%; housing, 19.5%; transportation, 12.7%; clothing, 11.5%; and healthcare, 6.2%, leaving only 13.6% uncategorized.

Those who got the stipend were less likely to be unsheltered after six months and able to meet more of their basic needs than a control group that got no money, and half as likely as the control group to have an episode of being unsheltered.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20231221131158/https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-12-19/750-a-month-no-questions-asked-improved-the-lives-of-homeless-people

  • @SCB
    link
    11 year ago

    Except they do, because they show the value of fungible, no-questions-asked support

    • Melllvar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s not “BI” that needs to be demonstrated. It’s “U”.

      Plus, these experiments do in fact ask questions about recipients’ income. Just like regular welfare programs.

      • @SCB
        link
        11 year ago

        I think you should reread this thread.

        • Melllvar
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think you’re neither serious nor sincere about making UBI work.

          • @SCB
            link
            11 year ago

            Interesting take- Why?

            • Melllvar
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Obviously because of your “reread the thread” comment.

              That’s not the response of someone who wants a meaningful discussion. That’s the response of someone who wants to end the discussion.

              • @SCB
                link
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s the response of a person who thinks you’re having a conversation with someone else that you think you’re having with me, based on the not-quite-on-topic nature of your posting.

                For instance, my first sentence in this entire comment section is

                We’re honestly not at a point where UBI is sustainable.