• @RBWells
    link
    1011 months ago

    Me too, kids made my life so much better, but oof I hate when people push their lifestyle on others, child free and natalist proselytizers can both fuck off. We aren’t going to run out of people, or get too many, you can see it adjusting even now. It seems so normal for people in a crowded world to want fewer kids, and slow birth rate is so much nicer than war or plague as a way to control population.

    • @DuckOverload
      link
      0
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Ya… the only problem is WHO is having all the kids.

      • @afraid_of_zombies
        link
        011 months ago

        I think you should elaborate on it. Please tell us what group of people are having kids that you think should not be?

        • @DuckOverload
          link
          211 months ago

          Generally, people that are less educated or with shitty values. It’s not about genetics; it’s about the perpetuation of bad culture. If I were to name some groups that typify this: religious fundies and under-educated rednecks.

          • @Deuces
            link
            111 months ago

            It’s hard to have this argument without coming across as advocating for eugenics, but I completely agree. The fact that increasing women’s education is so strongly correlated with decreased population growth is not a coincidence.

            https://wol.iza.org/articles/female-education-and-its-impact-on-fertility/long#:~:text=The correlation is strong and,children per woman to two.

            The difference between a eugenicists and whatever the hell I am is that I think the solution is to educate more people, not to control their right to reproduce.

            • @DuckOverload
              link
              111 months ago

              Right. There’s also a huge difference between taking measures that affect birth rates and actively rounding people up and culling them. Eugenics has got to be the most equivocated term in the English language. Except maybe god.