• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      I work tech support for a NAS company and the ratio of HDDs to SSDs is roughly 85-15. Sometimes people use SSDs for stuff that requires low latency, but most commonly they’re used as a cache for HDDs in my experience.

        • @Chobbes
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          Lower power usage and smaller and maaaaaaaaybe better reliability. I’d probably do it if it was cost competitive… but it’s not yet.

          • mihies
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Not sure whether adding more power consuming devices results in less power consumption, though. I guess it depends on drives power usage and files use.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Smaller doesn’t matter if they’re going in a 3.5" tray. There are some models that only come with 2.5" trays, but go figure, the only 2.5" model that isn’t a 5-figure all-flash enterprise-scale model is one of our least popular models

        • @CaptainProton
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          If the NAS supports tiered storage, you benefit from high I/O performance for things like video editing.

          My home storage is a NAS connected over 10GbE, I never bothered trying to play games off of it, but I’ll bet they’d run great. Read & write over the network at 10 gigabit is faster on a machine with (separate) RAID arrays of SSDs and HDDs than internal SATA3 connectivity which is kind of bonkers for a home user. Plus that has virtual machines and cloud backups running on the NAS side.

    • @guacupado
      link
      English
      71 year ago

      Work for one of the largest and we literally finished phasing out tape this year lol.

      • @CaptainProton
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        In favor of what? Spinning rust, or some other media for archival backups?