• @Emerald
    link
    69 months ago

    If it comes down to that, I think Beast would be a no brainer.

    • @zeppo
      link
      English
      -19 months ago

      The literal no brain would be JAKE PAUL YEAh he can punch people, but yeah.

      • @Emerald
        link
        19 months ago

        Is there an ihadastroke community for lemmy?

        I’m sorry but I can’t tell what you are trying to say.

        • @zeppo
          link
          English
          29 months ago

          Okay, let me diagram the sentence for you.

          The

          • literal no-brain (adjective)
            – would (verb modifier)
            — be (verb)
            — JAKE PAUL (noun, subject)
            then, as a run-on sentence, and exclamation

          • Yeah (exclamation

          • he (pronoun, subject)

          • can (affirmative)

          • punch (verb)

          • people (noun)

          Since you don’t seem to understand American English as commonly spoken, I’ll try to explain. If you’ve had a stroke recently, I understand.

          “The literal no brain” means “the action that would be done by someone who has no brains”, as in, very unintelligent or not thinking.

          “would be”

          “JAKE PAUL YEAh” : to cheer for Jake Paul.

          “he can punch people” : in context, someone with no brains would cheer for Jake Paul due to his physical fighting prowess.

          Hope that helps.

          • @Emerald
            link
            1
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            That does not help

            Funny way to explain all that though so I must approve of the effort