@[email protected] to TechnologyEnglish • 11 months agoThe first minds to be controlled by generative AI will live inside video gameswww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up1229arrow-down135cross-posted to: simulationtheory
arrow-up1194arrow-down1external-linkThe first minds to be controlled by generative AI will live inside video gameswww.cnbc.com@[email protected] to TechnologyEnglish • 11 months agomessage-square86fedilinkcross-posted to: simulationtheory
minus-squareKogasalinkfedilinkEnglish4•11 months agoNo such thing has been “mathematically proven.” The emergent behavior of ML models is their notable characteristic. The whole point is that their ability to do anything is emergent behavior.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•edit-211 months agoHere’s a white paper explicitly proving: No emergent properties (illusory due to bad measures) Predictable linear progress with model size https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.15004 The field changes fast, I understand it is hard to keep up
minus-squareKogasalinkfedilinkEnglish2•11 months agoSure, if you define “emergent abilities” just so. It’s obvious from context that this is not what I described.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-1•11 months agoTheir paper uses industry standard definitions
minus-squareKogasalinkfedilinkEnglish2•11 months agoTheir paper uses terminology that makes sense in context. It’s not a definition of “emergent behavior.”
No such thing has been “mathematically proven.” The emergent behavior of ML models is their notable characteristic. The whole point is that their ability to do anything is emergent behavior.
Here’s a white paper explicitly proving:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.15004
The field changes fast, I understand it is hard to keep up
Sure, if you define “emergent abilities” just so. It’s obvious from context that this is not what I described.
Their paper uses industry standard definitions
Their paper uses terminology that makes sense in context. It’s not a definition of “emergent behavior.”