Title says it. Apparently lemmy devs are not concerned with such worldly matters as privacy, or respecting international privacy laws.

  • @ttmrichterEnglish
    8•1 year ago

    They can’t fine the “lemmy devs” (nor any other Fediverse devs). They can fine the operators of servers, and even there only those operating servers in the legal jurisdiction of the EU (which is checks notes the EU).

    • 0xtero
      2•1 year ago

      In this case, the “lemmy devs” and the operators of lemmy.ml are the same people and it’s hosted within EU.
      But - that’s still a far cry from getting any kind of GDPR violation report going, much less getting it through the process to actual fines.
      People like to bring up GDPR violations as a some kind of super-moderator tool, but it isn’t that easy and it definitely isn’t automated.

      • @ttmrichterEnglish
        2•1 year ago

        You are missing theseveral points.

        1. Lemmy is software. lemmy.ml is a server. The devs of Lemmy can’t be fined unless specifically the server they operate (lemmy.ml, recall) is doing something against the GDPR.
        2. There is more than Lemmy in this picture. You’re on kbin. There’s dozens of other servers based on ActivityPub out there, all of which can be breaking the GDPR. This non-problem is not related to Lemmy. It’s the foundational architecture of ActivityPub. (And HTTP, incidentally. And XMPP. And and and and… Literally every distributed protocol ever made or that ever will be made has this non-problem.
        3. The things people are complaining about here may not actually even be covered by GDPR.
          • @ttmrichterEnglish
            2•1 year ago

            Yeah, sorry, man. All the ignorance was blurring together and your post was caught unjustly in the fringe.