• @WhiteHawk
      link
      English
      -261 year ago

      Not sure I’d list Al Jazeera here, the other two would do just fine

        • @WhiteHawk
          link
          English
          -91 year ago

          Fine, then get rid of both

        • rivermonster
          link
          English
          -191 year ago

          If you judge via your personal antisemitism, not based on data and objectivity.

          • acargitz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            9
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t see what is antisemitic about considering an Israeli publication (even a good one like Haaretz) to be subject to the same kind of inherent biases as a Qatari one. Israelis are not magically exempt from bias, to claim otherwise would be the kind of a prejudice that feeds antisemitism.

            If you have objective data to show why Haaretz does not suffer from bias, please go ahead and point to them.

            • rivermonster
              link
              English
              -7
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I believe you’re being earnest so I’m giving you the best information I have and doing my best to explain here.

              For one thing Al Jazeera is literally owned by Quatar who funds and is allied with Hamas. The Hamas leadership all live there, as millionaires, under the protection of the state that owns the media outlet.

              This is why their Media Bias Fact check is notably lower than Haaretz. Medium credibility vs. High credibility

              https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/al-jazeera/

              https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/haaretz/

              Secondly, Haaretz is not owned by the Israeli government. Which not being state owned automatically gives it a credibility edge.

              Personally, I do not like Haaretz, they are too soft on the conflict for me. But I don’t dispute the veracity of their journalism.

              Al Jazeera though is just a state run propaganda machine for Qatar and Hamas.

              EDIT and PS: For non Israeli/Hamas war, Al Jazeera isn’t as bad, for things they have no stake in its slightly better in it’s journalism. Same way you’d NEVER go to the BBC for info on the UK.

              • acargitz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                61 year ago

                I don’t know anything about the raters’ objectivity but I asked for evidence and you did provide them. Touché.

                • @Hamartia
                  link
                  English
                  51 year ago

                  What we need is a website that checks the bias of media-bias-fact-check-websites.

                  • rivermonster
                    link
                    English
                    -3
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    MBFC is a gold standard.

                    https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/about/

                    Likely, you want a way to feed confirmation bias when the facts don’t support your narrative or view. For that, a bias or fact checker won’t help.

                    But if you really don’t like MBFC, then you could also check out All Sides and Ad Fontes Media.

      • rivermonster
        link
        English
        -211 year ago

        Considering Al Jazeera (aka Quatar state media, literally) is the official publication of Hamas, definitely agree.

        Your downvotes are from all the Hamas members in WorldNews.

        • @OccamsTeapot
          link
          English
          101 year ago

          Your downvotes are from all the Hamas members in WorldNews

          IDF wants to know your location