• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      311 months ago

      Okay and you could have 50% more homes available if 20% of the SFH in a city was converted into apartments. 7% is nothing if we actually would densify what we build rather than just sprawling suburbs.

    • Pxtl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 months ago

      “empty or not for usual residents.” is a useless metric. Student houses are considered “empty” if the the students have a family home to return to and haven’t updated their mailing address.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 months ago

        Wrong. It states directly in the article that students and foreign workers are not included in that metric.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -1
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          The usual residence of students is that of their parents, if they return to live with their parents during the year even if they live elsewhere while attending school or working at a summer job.

          From Stats Canada.

          Students are usual residents of Canada, they’re not usual residents of the place they stay in while studying in school.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            Students and workers from other countries with study and work permits are considered usual residents, according to StatsCan.

            Directly quoted from the source I posted.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              That’s why I clarified how you misinterpreted that sentence, and gave you a source from Stats Canada. I also worked the last census in KW, where there’s a large student population, so it was drilled into our heads students only count if they live in that house year round (and preferable changed the address on their ID).