• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -32
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    All EVs still require coal or oil for the electricity. And that doesn’t even factor in mining for the metals to make these things.

    EV are okay but they’re not a solution to our resource consumption problem.

    Edit: imagine being mad at the truth lol?

    • qantravon
      link
      English
      181 year ago

      You seem to be forgetting that wind, solar, geothermal, hydroelectric, and nuclear power exist.

      Not to mention that, even with coal generating the energy for the cars, EVs still have lower lifetime emissions than any ICE car.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -171 year ago

        But there is still the precious metal mining which often is diesel engines.

        The point is regardless of what we use it is a bandaid to the issue. That issue being over mining our very limited resources

        • @Kachilde
          link
          111 year ago

          You’re right. Let’s do nothing instead.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -111 year ago

            It’s not sustainable why are you mad at me for the reality of the situation. The capitalists are selling you on this being a cure all your anger should be with them

            • SaltySalamander
              link
              fedilink
              7
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              What do you suggest, then? Go back to horses and buggies? I’ve yet to see, in all of your whining, one fucking suggestion as to how we correct the issue. Society will collapse before we voluntarily throw ourselves back to the dark ages. Isn’t a person on Earth living in a modern society, yourself included if you really think about it, that would agree to that.

            • qantravon
              link
              English
              61 year ago

              Nobody here is saying it’s a cure all. It’s a step in the right direction. It’s better than doing nothing and continuing on the course we’ve been on. Do you think an “all or nothing” approach has any chance of working?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -71 year ago

                And I’m not saying don’t do it? Do you think it is all or nothing? I’m just bringing up the fact that EV isn’t really that great

        • qantravon
          link
          English
          51 year ago

          Diesel engines have nothing to do with what we were talking about.

          And even if you want to call it a “band-aid”, that’s still better than letting the wound continue to bleed. It slows us down and gives us a chance to course correct, rather than barrelling ahead over the cliff at full speed.

        • @set_secret
          link
          11 year ago

          the diesil trucks will also be replaced with sustainably powered ev machines too. think more than 12 months ahead.

        • @RubberElectrons
          link
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I agree with you, but I urge you to spell it out a bit more. We still need to transport lots of goods across large distances, from distinct areas where an industry perhaps cannot be moved closer, eliminating the long distance transport.

          More importantly, we do have options for recycling lithium from expended cells, not a zero-carbon process, but definitely better than continued mining.

          Look, real talk: I think there very genuinely may be too many humans for this planet to naturally sustain. Even within society there are hints, in spite of the powers that be’s attempts at obfuscation. Look how many bullshit jobs there are. Late stage capitalism is a lot more than a bogeyman from what I can see.

          What are your thoughts?

    • @kaffiene
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      Except that many places are majority renewables for electricity

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -91 year ago

        That use plastics and rare metals and glass all of which aren’t infinite resources.

        Two decades from now we will still be struggling with a climate crisis and these “solutions” aren’t solutions

        • @kaffiene
          link
          English
          61 year ago

          Glass? That is in no way a rare resource. We have alternatives to plastic and alternative battery architectures are being developed from multiple quarters. It’s true that these still have environmental impact but it’s still a huge improvement over ICE vehicles.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Fully agree I only mention glass because it is viewed as an infinitely recyclable material but it really isn’t. We live on a silicate rich planet but even then there is a limit and these are the conversations we need to normalize before we do this same thing to ourselves again with our mass consumption of all resources