If people aren’t panicked, they wouldn’t elect panic-pandering politicians, so there must always be a panic — crime, drugs, commies, libruls, etc.
If people aren’t panicked, they wouldn’t elect panic-pandering politicians, so there must always be a panic — crime, drugs, commies, libruls, etc.
That’s not really my point, is it?
Well, what is your point? If we can’t trust the statistics we do have “because police are just making them up”, then … we know nothing at all about crime levels? That doesn’t seem helpful. You must have some idea of what could be done better.
Exactly what I said. That the data is thin.
If I don’t, does that invalidate my point? Does the cited data become more reliable somehow?