sunnie to Programmer [email protected] • 1 year agono.. just nolemmy.caimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up1558arrow-down118
arrow-up1540arrow-down1imageno.. just nolemmy.casunnie to Programmer [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square93fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink14•1 year agoI’d like you to think for a moment about CTEs, the HAVING clause, window functions and every other funky and useful thing you can do in SQL … Now just think, do you think that this syntax supports all those correctly?
minus-squarePrimarily0617linkfedilink33•1 year agosql syntax doesn’t support even itself correctly i fail to see your point
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink16•1 year agoProbably no better or worse than any other ORM written in a more traditional language. Worst comes to worst, you can always escape to plain SQL.
I’d like you to think for a moment about CTEs, the HAVING clause, window functions and every other funky and useful thing you can do in SQL … Now just think, do you think that this syntax supports all those correctly?
sql syntax doesn’t support even itself correctly i fail to see your point
Probably no better or worse than any other ORM written in a more traditional language. Worst comes to worst, you can always escape to plain SQL.
deleted by creator