From the opinion piece:

Last year, I pointed out how many big publishers came crawlin’ back to Steam after trying their own things: EA, Activision, Microsoft. This year, for the first time ever, two Blizzard games released on Steam: Overwatch and Diablo 4.

  • R0cket_M00se
    link
    English
    111 year ago

    Fanboys and monopolies, name a better combination.

      • R0cket_M00se
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        You missed an opportunity to say “coffee and biscuits” and I’ve never been more disappointed 😔

    • @chitak166
      link
      English
      -11 year ago

      Sorry you got swindled into buying games on a bunch of different launchers.

      • R0cket_M00se
        link
        English
        -11 year ago

        I’ve not been “swindled” into anything, I’ve never paid for shit twice and I get most of my games DRM free on GOG. I use Epic exclusively for their free games.

        I’m just sick of hearing Gabe’s personal blowjob brigade pretending that monopolies and capitalism don’t apply when it’s a product they personally enjoy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -21 year ago

      Monopoly isn’t bad (or illegal) if it doesn’t exploit and/or abuse it’s market position, which Steam doesn’t.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Monopolies are always bad. They give too much power to the people who do not deserve it. Even if the one in charge looks benevolent.

        Tell me, what do you think would happen if Gabe died tomorrow?

      • darreninthenet
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Also it depends what’s driving that attitude… if it’s an ethos from Gabe then great but he won’t be around forever… what happens when he dies/retires?

        Many companies have started with great ethics that went out of the window when the founders moved on, and Steam is in a fantastic position to enshitify if it wanted to.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          That’s a lot or what-ifs. If a lot of companies enshittify, that doesn’t mean all do. Especially when Valve is not publicly traded (sure, “for now”). It has a lot of credibility, especially compared to other launchers (EA, Ubi, Bethesda, Battle.net). And while there is GOG which is a great launcher aswell especially by selling games without DRM, it’s one in a million.

          By your logic, we shouldn’t trust any company because they can all enshittify.

          • darreninthenet
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            If you replaced “company” with “monopoly” in your last sentence, I agree.

            • R0cket_M00se
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              Doesn’t even have to be a monopoly, I have zero loyalty to any business beyond the product they give me. Trust is for people, not for some nebulous corporate entity who wants my money.

      • R0cket_M00se
        link
        English
        01 year ago

        Monopolies are bad. Period. End of story.

        You probably identify as leftist yet here you are shilling for corporate capitalism the moment you like the product.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I don’t identify as neither, I do no follow politics, nor do I care about some left right bullshit.

          But yeah, if a product is good, I do recommend it if there is discussion. Your regular Joe is not gonna build his own home printer, he goes to the store and either buys an HP, or a Brother. They don’t know how to pirate games, they go to a launcher and buy it there.

          You have to understand that not everyone has the freedom to choose, because they simply don’t have time or don’t give a fuck, and settle for something that someone recommends.

      • @Aux
        link
        English
        -5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But it does abuse its market position. By setting very high developer/publisher fees and forcing everyone to pay them. Don’t forget that from Steam perspective, developers and publisher are their consumers, not you. Their business is similar to supermarkets. Supermarkets don’t sell stuff to you, they provide selling and logistics services to produce manufacturers.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          But those fees are counteracted by large user base, which is large due to the fact the platform is great and provides it’s users good features that aren’t elsewhere. A s large user base means large buying power, which directly translates to higher sales and thus higher profits.

          If a supermarket gives the customers a nice place to stay, and provides extra features others don’t, the extra cost for having your store in there (in Steam terms higher commissions, although I personally think it’s adequate, but I digress) is offset by having bigger profit overall.

          • @Aux
            link
            English
            -21 year ago

            That doesn’t mean Steam doesn’t abuse its power. Because they sure do.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              How? By being a good company? Look at the Google Play Store lawsuit, and why were they sued, any why they lost. Steam is not abusing it’s position. And if you think they do, gimme an example or two please.