The world population grew by 75 million people over the past year and on New Year’s Day it will stand at more than 8 billion people, according to figures released by the U.S. Census Bureau on Thursday.

The worldwide growth rate in the past year was just under 1%. At the start of 2024, 4.3 births and two deaths are expected worldwide every second, according to the Census Bureau figures.

The growth rate for the United States in the past year was 0.53%, about half the worldwide figure. The U.S. added 1.7 million people and will have a population on New Year’s Day of 335.8 million people.

      • @TheDeepState
        link
        -76 months ago

        Or WW3. One of the obstacles to universal basic income is too many people.

        • @DannyMac
          link
          English
          46 months ago

          Won’t be any UBI in a nuclear hell scape unless it means Unusable Biosphere Integrity.

        • @Fredselfish
          cake
          link
          16 months ago

          We get Star Trek universe if we have one of those but not sure any of us would get to enjoy that.

      • F_Haxhausen
        link
        56 months ago

        Yeah. There was a guy calling everyone a eugenicist for simply saying we need less people to help bring down climate change.

        He said that was just a ploy.

        I can’t wait to not exist, for many reasons. But people like that is at the top of my list.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          If you want the population to decline, then there has to be some kind of filter for who gets to live or reproduce. Even if it’s 100% random with no racial/religious/whatever bias involved, you must still remove a significant chunk of people, or at least cause them not to reproduce. That’s the best case scenario. Even trying it is almost asking for someone to co-opt it for their fascist goals; it almost certainly won’t be 100% random, and bias towards specific populations will occur. It almost certainly will devolve into eugenics.

          The Earth can support this many people. We know how. What it can’t do is support it with utility monster billionaires around.

        • HACKthePRISONS
          link
          fedilink
          -26 months ago

          >There was a guy calling everyone a eugenicist for simply saying we need less people to help bring down climate change.

          yea. that’s ecofascist rhetoric. of course they told you what you’re doing.

          • F_Haxhausen
            link
            16 months ago

            It’s fascist only if people don’t choose on their own, making the choice, entirely their free choice.

            • HACKthePRISONS
              link
              fedilink
              -16 months ago

              you don’t seem to understand that you’re just saying the same thing ecofascists say, then rationalizing it by saying “it’s only propaganda. i’m not forcing anyone to do anything”

      • Cosmoooooooo
        link
        266 months ago

        All the most habitable spots are already taken. The only spots left have major disadvantages.

        You can’t just ‘spread out’ all the people. It doesn’t work that way. Not everyone wants to live on a cliffside road in Colorado, Idaho, Montana, or wherever. Nor is it advantageous in any way to do so.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -156 months ago

          Nor is it advantageous in any way to do so.

          Bullshit. Who else would want to go to such a place? Weird living conditions just take a bit of time to get used to and nobody is going to bother you.

      • @bitwaba
        link
        96 months ago

        All the efficiencies for transportation and infrastructure are possible because of big cities. One of the biggest contributors to us getting climate change under control will be our ability to leverage the most amount of green energy policies for the least amount of resources.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        46 months ago

        Which would require far more energy to support. Concentration means easier logistics, less transportation, and less overall resources required