• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4811 months ago

    Not to defend Fahrenheit, it’s a nonsense scale, however: As with most subjective scales the entire scale can be split into good and not good. The top part is good and the bottom part is not good. The middle of the top part is seen as average good.

    So around 75 degrees would be perfect, which is close enough for something as subjective as temperature.

    This is why in things like movie or game reviews a 7/10 is seen as average. Like it’s good, in the good part, but right in the middle not anything special. A 5/10 or lower is seen as not good, not worth seeing, not worth your time etc. This works for reviews, grades, person attractiveness rating etc.

    • Norgur
      link
      fedilink
      2811 months ago

      Yet, Temperature is not a nonlinear star-rating by IGN, is it?

        • Norgur
          link
          fedilink
          1111 months ago

          The flooding of Amsterdam was really epic, 10/10 IGN

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -111 months ago

        Why not? Most people only meaningfully engage with temperature scales when checking weather forecasts. It’s all pretty subjective.

        If course there’s a need for Celsius or Kelvin in scientific applications, but that’s not for the overwhelming majority of people.

        • @psud
          link
          111 months ago

          but that’s not for the overwhelming majority of people.

          Surely you’re aware that the overwhelming majority of people do not live in the US. Nearly everyone is fine with Celcius. Billions of people, as opposed to a few hundred million that have been socialised to using the other scale

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      75 perfect?

      Well at least you have the right attitude the way our climate is headed

    • @jenny_ball
      link
      211 months ago

      i appreciate your level headed analysis