seahorse [Ohio]M to [email protected]English • 10 months agoI HATE that this is real and not doctoredmidwest.socialimagemessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up1561arrow-down134
arrow-up1527arrow-down1imageI HATE that this is real and not doctoredmidwest.socialseahorse [Ohio]M to [email protected]English • 10 months agomessage-square68fedilink
minus-squareNaibofTabrlinkfedilinkEnglish55•10 months agoRaytheon, I don’t think you can greenwash weapon manufacturing.
minus-squareChariotwheellinkfedilink54•10 months agoFor every person you kill we plant a tree. It’s both good for the environment and a very visible kill count.
minus-squareLizlinkfedilinkEnglish14•10 months agoYou could argue that just killing people is statistically good for the planet.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•10 months agoAnd if it takes out a plane, that’s pretty effective, too!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoNo, because that one is going to get replaced with a new one burning the same amount of fuel. So basically flying one plane for 20 years is better than 2 planes over 20 years where one of them went to junk early.
minus-squareBhaelfurlinkEnglish17•10 months agoYeah, the air has greenhouse gasses and what do they make? Anti AIR missiles! Kablammo greenhouse gasses!
Raytheon, I don’t think you can greenwash weapon manufacturing.
For every person you kill we plant a tree. It’s both good for the environment and a very visible kill count.
You could argue that just killing people is statistically good for the planet.
And if it takes out a plane, that’s pretty effective, too!
No, because that one is going to get replaced with a new one burning the same amount of fuel. So basically flying one plane for 20 years is better than 2 planes over 20 years where one of them went to junk early.
amazon regrowth speed run
its anti air missiles. Its for good.
Yeah, the air has greenhouse gasses and what do they make? Anti AIR missiles! Kablammo greenhouse gasses!