Google search failed to even find a hollywood movie, even after 1 hour of attempts. I don’t really care about the movie, but I am terrified by the prospect that google now ceased to function on this basic level. Why is this happening?

I understand the explanations of seo and other stuff like spam content. But why are there NO relevant results at all.

I wouldn’t mind having to start wading through results at page 2 or even 10 but now it utterly fails to find even the most basic things.

Things you found on the first attempt even just a year ago. Now they are effectively hidden.

To me functionally the entire internet has now vanished. I cannot access anything that I am searching for. Might as well not exist at all.

Has anybody found a way around this?

Is this on purpose? Is this an attack on the free internet, herding people to just the top 5 sites like facebook, youtube, tiktok, and so forth?

Are there search engines that still work?

  • @Supervisor194
    link
    3161 year ago

    Everybody is blaming SEO, which is true - but Google is also hamstrung by walled gardens.

    Before Facebook, most content posted to the web was open. It could be viewed by anyone without logging in. Reddit even uses this paradigm.

    But then Facebook started putting everything behind their account login and suddenly, Google can no longer spider a significant amount of the conversation going on on the Internet - and it can’t link you to it either, because the link would be dead if you weren’t a logged-in Facebook user. And of course it’s not just Facebook.

    This is why appending site:reddit.com has come into fashion in the past couple years. Reddit, being open, viewable without a login, is a fantastic source for finding people who are talking about exactly what you’re searching for.

    And it’s another reason why Meta is cancer: all the conversations going on about whatever problem you are experiencing that made you do a search in the first place, if they exist in private groups on something like Facebook - they are useless to you and useless to anyone but the members of that private group. We are losing our giant public knowledge base because capitalism.

    • @Aurix
      link
      2571 year ago

      You really need to add Discord to this list as it is soaking up gigantic amounts of information about video games as a forum replacement. One could argue for actual community games like MMO’s it is perhaps slightly different, but for the majority it is a huge problem.

      • mesamune
        link
        1101 year ago

        In 10 years, when we move off discord for “the next big thing” all that info will be gone yet again. It happened to slack and it will most likely happen to discord. None of it will be indexed too. Fun times.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            121 year ago

            Tools for backing up servers already exist: https://github.com/Tyrrrz/DiscordChatExporter But unfortunately discord can’t be easily scraped in one coordinated attempt unlike reddit due to the massive number of private servers and existing verification/anti-bot mechanisms. As a result, only the communities that have data hoarders will be actually archived.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Good link, though not the one I used. I’ve already begun taking measures archiving various chats. Even if Discord lives, my account might not.

      • @Dkarma
        link
        -831 year ago

        But u can login to discord and if the room is public you can see the content. Even if ur logged into FB if ur not in the private group u can’t see the content.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          751 year ago

          Even if ur logged into FB if ur not in the private group u can’t see the content.

          Well yes, that’s entirely the point of the comment above: unlike old school forums, discord is just as useless as Facebook in helping search engines deliver useful content.

        • @Dozzi92
          link
          531 year ago

          I think the point is you can’t put a search term into a search engine and get results from some random Discord. No body is going to go trawling through Discords to then use the search function to potentially find information from it. Now, if chats were somehow archived and could then be searchable, different story, but I don’t think that’s what people using Discord want from Discord.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -111 year ago

            yeah, this is a problem. But in practice i found that if your searching for one niche problem and your only lead is discord, the people there are going to be kind and help.

            I know the pain on having to join something’s discord to get info, but it’s usually fast after I join.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              121 year ago

              But the bigger issue appears when you don’t have a clear place to go. It’s like we’ve gone back to before written records were common. Once that server goes and the people scatter, that information might as well never have existed. 5 years after Discord disappears, the only knowledge people will be able to find of it will be a handful of old messages complaining about some dude who scammed a bunch of people with low quality iron Doge coin.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                I get it, it is a problem. But I just wanted to up the mood by saying that “you can get the info”. ig I just made ppl mad :/

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  31 year ago

                  I can’t see downvotes, but I imagine that people just took it as you disagreeing and saying that it’s not a problem.

                  I was thinking of stuff that’s super niche anyways, like if you’re trying to keep a program running that your company’s database relies on that hasn’t been supported since Windows 95 or something absurd like that. For most stuff, it’s still possible to find at least somebody with an answer, even if you have to go to a Discord server for it. But when nobody has documented stuff that’s super obscure? Good luck!

        • NaibofTabr
          link
          fedilink
          English
          301 year ago

          You can see the content, but it isn’t categorized, tagged or organized in any way. If you’re looking for some specific information but you don’t know which server/channel it was discussed on, you’ll never find it.

          • @AWittyUsername
            link
            14
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah I can’t stand discord. Impossible to find anything, constantly feel like I’ve joined a conversation that has been in progress for months so have to scroll up ages to get any sort of context.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              I don’t engage socially in random Discord servers, I’m almost certainly just there for an FAQ, to ask a question, or to use Discord’s- pretty decent- search function to find someone who’s had whatever issue I’m having before.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          Sidebar from someone who is probrbly just to old to know: How would I go about finding discords that are relevant to my intrests? I am a member on a few servers, but the discovery was always the other way around: I found the invite-link on a website/community that dealt with the topic I was intrested in.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          Aren’t you comparing apples and oranges:

          If the server is private, then you can’t search it. If the group is private, then you can’t search it.

          If it is public you can on either platform but must participate on the platform. That’s what made Reddit unique: lurking was real easy and didn’t require an account.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      961 year ago

      Reddit keeps asking me to use their app and they are very clearly making the mobile browser version worse and worse.
      Just last week I couldn’t view a thread I found on Google without signing in. It wasn’t adult content and didn’t require verifying my age. The reason given was very vague and had something to do with the content not being vetted (despite being old).

      The Reddit garden wall is already here and is currently being rolled out. For your own good, of course.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        221 year ago

        Probably this:

        “Unreviewed Content
        This community has not been reviewed and might contain content inappropriate for certain viewers. View in the Reddit app to continue.”

        Knew I could find it by searching for an in-theaters film followed by “DVD rip reddit”. Behold / old reddit link.

        The sub exists to funnel people to a single TinyUrl. Checking the preview instead, I expect it (123movieshd dot club) is a malware distributor.

        While reddit’s tactic is coercive, it also functions as a lazy way to fight the reach/effectiveness of spammers.

          • @Juvyn00b
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            Agreed, but it’s been working now for longer than I originally expected. I wonder if some part of their choice base totally relies on that being available…

      • Optional
        link
        51 year ago

        Yeah it’s true. Too bad. Bye reddit.

      • @AWittyUsername
        link
        31 year ago

        Use Firefox and there are extensions that block the app request popup. Or you could use tampermonkey or something similar to do it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            The page still loads behind it, usually, there’s just a popup keeping you from accessing it. So I don’t see how they could stop you from just… removing the popup.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Sure, to see a few top-level replies. That’s another part of it, you’ve got to click “see more” several times in order to see every branch of the conversation. None of that is hidden behind the overlay element.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      Also, starting in 2018 Google no longer actually searches for the words you entered. Instead, it tries to figure out “what you really mean” and shows results for that. See BERT

    • @morphballganon
      link
      21 year ago

      “… Google can no longer spider a significant amount…”

      What?

      • @BreadstickNinja
        link
        English
        24
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “A Web crawler, sometimes called a spider or spiderbot and often shortened to crawler, is an Internet bot that systematically browses the World Wide Web and that is typically operated by search engines for the purpose of Web indexing.”

        Wikipedia

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      But I think that’s letting Google off the hook because when I search for things I do get hits, it’s just weird and I get terrible hits. Last week I was looking for something specific and I found five pages in the top 10 that were all variations on each other, to the point that I assume some of them were automatically generated but have no idea which is the actual original source, if any.

      And then if I’m searching for something like song lyrics, the top five hits are all sites that require JavaScript to be enabled and AdBlock to be disabled. Of course Google could filter its rankings to bring sites like this out of the top 10.

      So I agree with you that capitalism is a huge issue but one specific issue here is that the Google developers don’t care about things that we care about. And other companies such as Apple and Facebook are worse of course.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -81 year ago

      👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆 👆