• Random_Character_A
    link
    -1911 months ago

    Random mutations are the least potent source of change in evolutionary mechanisms. So much so that some experts don’t even consider them as one.

    Reinforcement of already existing traits through variation between individuals under environmental preasure is the main mechanism. (i.e. when food sources are high, individuals with longest reach are the fittest).

    • @silver13
      link
      3911 months ago

      And the longest reach comes from… random mutation?

          • @Beryl
            link
            611 months ago

            To be fair to him, this type of variations could also be due to epigenetics, although he obviously has a rather fuzzy understanding of what he’s talking about.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -711 months ago

        How to say that you didn’t read Lamarck without saying that you didn’t read Lamarck. Even Darwin agreed with him.

        • SociallyIneptWeeb
          link
          1111 months ago

          You seriously believe in Lamarck? Like, I don’t know, I’m not a native speaker, maybe I’m missing something.

          How many fucking times do we have to repeat this: TRAITS ACQUIRED DURING LIFETIME ARE NON-INHERITABLE

          If you lose your fingers in an industrial accident, your children aren’t going to be born fingerless, are they?

          Giraffes don’t have long necks because one little giraffe long, long ago tried really, really hard to grow a longer neck, but because giraffes who had been born with longer necks could compete better than those without, and pass on their genes. And they got those necks due to mutations.

          Environmental pressure selects for benefitial mutations, while the mutations themselves are random. That’s literally the mechanism of evolution through natural selection.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            311 months ago

            But not by Darwin. The modern evolution theory is a synthesis of Darwin and Mendel. I should have elaborated but the joke was that Darwin didn’t have mutations in his theory yet and when you stick to Darwin Claus, there ain’t no mutations

            • no bananaOP
              link
              3
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Yes, this thread is about Darwin Claus. Not other (scientifically) magical science peeps. I’m sorry people didn’t get your joke.