• @FlowVoid
    link
    English
    -7
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Because “union density” is shorter. Just as “GDP” is shorter than “sum of the income of everyone in a country”.

    • @surewhynotlem
      link
      1411 months ago

      SINBIPDU

      (shorter is not better if people don’t understand)

      • @FlowVoid
        link
        English
        0
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It’s jargon, like “OOP” and “VRAM”. The people who tend to refer to it will understand.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I get the term after reading the article, I’ve just never heard it described that way before. Their own figures say union membership rates in the article which seems much clearer to me and has the same number of words as “union density rate.” Density seems to imply something more geographic or spatial, just seems like an odd way to describe it.

      • @FlowVoid
        link
        English
        211 months ago

        It’s an econ term, it doesn’t have to make sense to non-economists!

        For instance you would think the unemployment rate is the percentage of the population without employment, but no.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      Just as “GDP” is shorter than “sum of the income of everyone in a country” “who’s winning at capitalism”.

      • @FlowVoid
        link
        English
        011 months ago

        Winning is a matter of perspective. There are plenty of people of who would not want to move to a country with higher GDP.