Dave Chappelle has released a new Netflix special, The Dreamer, which is full of jokes about the trans community and disabled people.

“I love punching down!” he tells the audience, in a one-hour show that landed on the streaming service today (31 December).

It’s his seventh special for Netflix and comes two years after his last one, the highly controversial release The Closer.

That programme was criticised for its relentless jokes about the trans community, and Chappelle revisits the topic in his new show.

He tells jokes about trans women in prison, and about trans people “pretending” to be somebody they are not.

  • @weaponG
    link
    -171 year ago

    Comedy is the last bastion for free speech. Our constitution’s first amendment protects free speech regardless of how sensitive your feelings are or how much it has triggered your fabricated anxiety issue.

    • @youstolemyname
      link
      14
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Who was suggesting that the government censor him?!

      • @weaponG
        link
        -141 year ago

        My point exactly. Thanks to the Bill of Rights, the people have certain reserved and protected rights. These rights which we take for granted are not guaranteed in other countries and can lead to charges of blasphemy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Comedy is the last bastion for free speech

      Really? There’s literally no other free speech in the entire country? Guess those idiots on newsmaxx aren’t still lying about jewish space lasers then.

      • @weaponG
        link
        -121 year ago

        With cancel culture being so sensitive, free speech is under attack. I disagree with NewsMax and Nazis, but they have a right to express themselves without being cancelled.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          What does getting canceled have to do with the 1st amendment? You want the government to force companies to employ nazis?

          • @weaponG
            link
            -81 year ago

            I think you’ve missed the point or the intent of the first amenmdebt itself if you are asking that question.

            As for your second question, that is a straw man argument.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              61 year ago

              I think you’ve missed the point of the 1st amendment if you think it has anything to do with private entities canceling people. And if you don’t want nazis to get canceled but think that it’s unrelated to employment, who exactly is canceling them?

              Your argument about free speech and the first amendment is hopelessly convoluted with cancel culture.

    • @SendMePhotos
      link
      -11 year ago

      I’m pro trans but I do respect the first amendment. Be who you want to be. He has an audience who loves him… BUT… Hate should not be promoted in order to protect others… So I guess I’m mixed on this.

      • @weaponG
        link
        -101 year ago

        It is the first amendment which allows you to make your statement freely without fear of state-sponsored reprise.

        Netflix offers choices for entertainment. I don’t like most of the content on Netflix, but I don’t think it should be canceled just because I dislike it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          The First Amendment shields you from government reprisal. It is not a shield from private critique or consequences.

          • @weaponG
            link
            -131 year ago

            Public cancellation or being cancelled by a sensitive sub section of the population threatens free speech.

            • Stoneykins [any]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              71 year ago

              No it doesn’t full stop.

              Public “cancellation” is free speech by the public and it always will be

              • @weaponG
                link
                -51 year ago

                Public cancellation costs people their jobs, livelihoods, and even their lives because a sensitive, loud, and naive sub section of the population felt “triggered” by someone else’s right to free speech. This, in turn, makes others wary of the things they say and inhibits their free speech.

                People are presumed guilty without due process and are forced to grovel and apologize for otherwise meaningless acts which elevated the anxieties of the super sensitive. This is a witch hunt and has happened before in the US in Salem and during the McCarthy era. Both periods are seen as sore spots in our history.

                This is convenient when your opinion is with the majority. It a threat and unsustainable when your opinion is no longer the majority opinion.

                “Full stop”.

                • Stoneykins [any]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  3
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Lmao you don’t really even know what you are talking about.

                  “Free speech” means the government itself cannot infringe your speech. It doesn’t mean SHIT to anyone who isn’t the government. “The court of public opinion” is not a literal court! And it is a group expression of the free speech you love!

                  You are just bitching about people being deplatformed off of privately owned websites (which isn’t what happened to this asshole because he is on fuckin netflix) and you want to be dramatic and make it seem like they are all victims and need to be protected based on your misunderstanding of law