Dave Chappelle has released a new Netflix special, The Dreamer, which is full of jokes about the trans community and disabled people.

“I love punching down!” he tells the audience, in a one-hour show that landed on the streaming service today (31 December).

It’s his seventh special for Netflix and comes two years after his last one, the highly controversial release The Closer.

That programme was criticised for its relentless jokes about the trans community, and Chappelle revisits the topic in his new show.

He tells jokes about trans women in prison, and about trans people “pretending” to be somebody they are not.

  • @SendMePhotos
    link
    -111 months ago

    I’m pro trans but I do respect the first amendment. Be who you want to be. He has an audience who loves him… BUT… Hate should not be promoted in order to protect others… So I guess I’m mixed on this.

    • @weaponG
      link
      -1011 months ago

      It is the first amendment which allows you to make your statement freely without fear of state-sponsored reprise.

      Netflix offers choices for entertainment. I don’t like most of the content on Netflix, but I don’t think it should be canceled just because I dislike it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        911 months ago

        The First Amendment shields you from government reprisal. It is not a shield from private critique or consequences.

        • @weaponG
          link
          -1311 months ago

          Public cancellation or being cancelled by a sensitive sub section of the population threatens free speech.

          • Stoneykins [any]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            711 months ago

            No it doesn’t full stop.

            Public “cancellation” is free speech by the public and it always will be

            • @weaponG
              link
              -511 months ago

              Public cancellation costs people their jobs, livelihoods, and even their lives because a sensitive, loud, and naive sub section of the population felt “triggered” by someone else’s right to free speech. This, in turn, makes others wary of the things they say and inhibits their free speech.

              People are presumed guilty without due process and are forced to grovel and apologize for otherwise meaningless acts which elevated the anxieties of the super sensitive. This is a witch hunt and has happened before in the US in Salem and during the McCarthy era. Both periods are seen as sore spots in our history.

              This is convenient when your opinion is with the majority. It a threat and unsustainable when your opinion is no longer the majority opinion.

              “Full stop”.

              • Stoneykins [any]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Lmao you don’t really even know what you are talking about.

                “Free speech” means the government itself cannot infringe your speech. It doesn’t mean SHIT to anyone who isn’t the government. “The court of public opinion” is not a literal court! And it is a group expression of the free speech you love!

                You are just bitching about people being deplatformed off of privately owned websites (which isn’t what happened to this asshole because he is on fuckin netflix) and you want to be dramatic and make it seem like they are all victims and need to be protected based on your misunderstanding of law