• @Mango
      link
      English
      011 months ago

      So you think people are gonna gamble to deliver for you? Do you have any idea how much driving all day fucks your car up? Ask my dead car. I’m $10k in debt and it still won’t run.

    • StrikerOPM
      link
      English
      -111 months ago

      Cash is king in general. A cashless society is a shitty society.

      • @TrickDacy
        link
        English
        011 months ago

        Gotta disagree with this entirely. The only benefit I actually see the cash is that homeless folks don’t currently have great access to digital systems, which could be resolved if desired. What else is there?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          Google dominated search. Google search sucks now, there’s no equivalent alternatives.

          Banks dominate digital money. They don’t suck too much on a day to day basis… Yet.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          011 months ago

          Not allowing the government/banks the ability to freeze or seize your money because you did something they don’t approve of.

          Not giving the government/big companies a log of how you spend your money.

          • @TrickDacy
            link
            English
            011 months ago

            I have never once heard of an innocent person’s assets being frozen. That’s a nuclear option that’s not often used. I’m certainly never keeping my assets in cash anyhow, as that’s fucking bonkers.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              211 months ago

              Just because you haven’t heard of it doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen. It is a big world and everyone only sees their small piece of it.

              The Canadian government did recently it with the trucker protests. The US did it with operation Choke Point starting in 2013. It targeted 20+ categories of merchants including porn stars, cable box descramblers, and money transfer networks.

              The government routinely misuses the ‘justice’ system to wrongfully imprison people. Is it so hard to believe they will do the same thing with money? The government is not a neutral arbitrator of who is innocent. No one is innocent. But the government allows some people to be treated as more innocent than others.

              Cashless forces everyone to cede control of their money to the government through the banks. Do you want the government to be able to get a list of everyone who purchases abortion pills? Can you see how such an ability can be easily abused by government? Assuming the government will always be friendly to you is a false assumption.

              • @TrickDacy
                link
                English
                211 months ago

                You did not demonstrate any of those examples were unjustified. they probably were

                I do not expect the government to always behave, obviously because I am alive I have seen plenty of counterexamples.

                However it’s beyond insane to suggest keeping my life savings in cash is even close to being less risky than using a bank. It’s ludicrous to suggest that. Do you understand that? It’s not subjective.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  111 months ago

                  The examples were never proven to be justified by the government or anyone else. In both cases the government essentially said freeze these people’s money and the banks did. No due process. No presumption of innocence.

                  That is the danger of a cashless society.

                  • @TrickDacy
                    link
                    English
                    011 months ago

                    This almost never happens though. People have been robbed of their cash every single day for thousands of years.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  111 months ago

                  I never suggested keeping your life savings in cash. You brought that up. I ignored that bit as your financial decisions are your own. And they are just not relevant to the original point of a cashless society being bad.

                  • @TrickDacy
                    link
                    English
                    111 months ago

                    If you aren’t suggesting keeping money out of banks then what are you suggesting?

              • ANGRY_MAPLE
                link
                fedilink
                English
                211 months ago

                IIRC the protests in Canada were also super controversial, especially for the people who lived there at the time.

                I will not get into that here, though.

                If you aren’t keeping your life savings in cash and you wouldn’t trust digital currency, how would you propose your idea?

                Even stuff like bitcoin would be susceptible to your concerns about government overeach. Investing could also easily be a crapshoot, because your entire life saving would still be reliant on someone who doesn’t know or care you.

                What do you suggest?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -111 months ago

                  I would say you ideally have enough for about a month expenses in cash. Then maybe have 2 more months expense in two different bank accounts(1 in each account). That way any one bank blocking an account for a flagged transaction is just a minor inconvenience. Same thing with credit cards, have 2 different ones so 1 getting blocked is just a minor inconvenience. Anything beyond that I would probably put in a tax advantaged investing account like a roth ira invested in mutual funds.

                  I wouldn’t be opposed to holding some portion of long term investments in a well established blockchain like bitcoin or monero but I would hardly call it a necessity for most people. They are effectively out of the reach of governments if they are setup and used correctly. But I wouldn’t expect most people to have the know how and motivation to set them up and use them that way. Government can’t tell bitcoin to freeze your account. They can tell that to your bank.