• @blue_berry
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    Strategically, that’s an opportunity for the free fediverses today.

    Yeah, probably. Question is how big it will become. Let’s see.

    • The Nexus of PrivacyOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      In the short term, they’ll be much smaller than Meta’s fediverse (because mastodon.social and most of the big instances are federating with Threads) and of course much smaller than Threads. Longer term, we’ll see, but I wouldn’t expect them to be as big as Threads for a long time if ever.

      • @blue_berry
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Ok, I may have blown the discussion a bit out of proposition earlier. It’s just that I thought you meant basically the whole Fediverse. The name “Free Fediverse” is a bit misleading imo.

        • The Nexus of PrivacyOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Yeah, one of my takeaways is that I should have been clearer that this isn’t a proposal for the whole fediverse. And not sure what the best term to use is, “free fediverses” is what I’m going with for now (based on the freefediverse.org).

          • @blue_berry
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Free fediverse(s) makes sense, building on top of that already floating term sounds sensible

            • The Nexus of PrivacyOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              How about this as a revised first sentence to clarify the focus is on an alternative (not the whole fediverse)?

              As I discuss in the first post in the series, the “free fediverses” are regions of the fediverse that reject Meta and surveillance capitalism, and these strategies position the free fediverses as an alternative to Threads and “Meta’s fediverses”.