It must be nice living in a world where everything is black and white and all the answers are easy. It’s not that way in the big chair. Maybe at the student loans deak.
If you having trouble figuring out black and white when a kid cant eat, drink, lose his mom and siblings, maybe burned skinned, or a sniper (admited) shot his kneecap, then maybe you are blind.
Well, let’s address that. My representative supports genocide because she’s a maga chud. Her opponent in the last election was Michelle Vallejo, a progressive. Since the Democratic Party would prefer a maga chud to a progressive in any given seat, they cut Vallejo’s funding in the last month of the campaign.
But I said that “should we fund genocide” has an easy answer.
I did not ask “are we funding genocide” or “has Biden supported genocide using US funds appropriated by Congress” or “in which branch of government is the power of the purse vested.”
“Should we fund genocide” has an easy answer. It has a morally correct answer. That answer is no. We should not fund genocide. It’s clear that your answer differs.
Split hairs in support of the Netanyahu/Biden genocide at someone else.
Yes because there are no secret it is there on tv, social medias, and in the international court of justice.
It must be nice living in a world where everything is black and white and all the answers are easy. It’s not that way in the big chair. Maybe at the student loans deak.
If you having trouble figuring out black and white when a kid cant eat, drink, lose his mom and siblings, maybe burned skinned, or a sniper (admited) shot his kneecap, then maybe you are blind.
Habash was educated at the University of Miami and the Harvard Graduate School of Education.
“Should we fund genocide” has an easy answer.
Perhaps you should ask your congressmen. The White House doesn’t allocate, it administrates. Even Tariq Habash knows that.
Well, let’s address that. My representative supports genocide because she’s a maga chud. Her opponent in the last election was Michelle Vallejo, a progressive. Since the Democratic Party would prefer a maga chud to a progressive in any given seat, they cut Vallejo’s funding in the last month of the campaign.
But I said that “should we fund genocide” has an easy answer.
I did not ask “are we funding genocide” or “has Biden supported genocide using US funds appropriated by Congress” or “in which branch of government is the power of the purse vested.”
“Should we fund genocide” has an easy answer. It has a morally correct answer. That answer is no. We should not fund genocide. It’s clear that your answer differs.
Split hairs in support of the Netanyahu/Biden genocide at someone else.
Don’t complain to me that your candidate didn’t win an election.
I was letting you know that your candidate won.
I probably don’t live anywhere near you, but I can assure you my candidate does not win.
Any candidate that supports genocide is your candidate.