• SandmanXC
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    3 years ago

    This feels like the worst of both worlds. The whole ai “pitch” for the masses is that it can help small devs with no, say, art skills. This just ensures the corpos have free reign to do whatever they want.

    • Loki@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      No, it ensures that artists get paid for their work. If you can’t afford an artist, either don’t make a game or use free assets.

      • SandmanXC
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        It only ensures Ubisoft will build/buy a model they own and fire artists just as well. I fully agree with artists needing to get payed, but this to me feels like it’s giving big players a “free pass”, and they’re the ones that will deal the most damage.