• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    No, it ensures that artists get paid for their work. If you can’t afford an artist, either don’t make a game or use free assets.

    • @SandmanXC
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It only ensures Ubisoft will build/buy a model they own and fire artists just as well. I fully agree with artists needing to get payed, but this to me feels like it’s giving big players a “free pass”, and they’re the ones that will deal the most damage.