What constitutes a history and number of accidents?
What about the speed limit being too low and unreasonable resulting in breaches. For a similar argument look at drug use, marijuana is illegal most places but in most of those it’s use is accepted because the law is unreasonable.
You’re operating on the notion that the speed limit is fairly implemented.
Could be that it is too low for the road or hasn’t been adapted to suit safer and more capable modern cars.
Speed traps are a revenue collection project, not a way to improve safety. If it was you’d be stopped from speeding, not charged for it.
Nope. The site has to have a history of accidents. Also, cars might have improved but humans haven’t.
However, there is a sneaky trick you can do to avoid getting fined - don’t speed. I’ve tried it and it works.
https://www.ageas.co.uk/solved/road-safety/how-dangerous-does-a-road-have-to-be-to-get-a-speed-camera/
What constitutes a history and number of accidents?
What about the speed limit being too low and unreasonable resulting in breaches. For a similar argument look at drug use, marijuana is illegal most places but in most of those it’s use is accepted because the law is unreasonable.
It was instituted by the requests of people who live there. The speed limit is 35mph, which is very reasonable.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cornwall-64873885