• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    42
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And the next paragraph:

    The jet had been prevented from making long-haul flights over water so that the plane “could return very quickly to an airport” in the event the warnings happened again, NTSB chief Jennifer Homendy said.

    Which makes it sound like they couldn’t find the source of that warning but weren’t willing to completely write it off.

    Nevermind:

    “An additional maintenance look” was requested but “not completed” before the incident, Ms Homendy said.

    • @Darorad
      link
      281 year ago

      I mean I’d much prefer they didn’t fly a plane that was repeatedly saying there’s a serious issue with it.

      • @Dagnet
        link
        231 year ago

        So the blinking engine light in my car isn’t just for festive vibes?

        • @Bytemeister
          link
          Ελληνικά
          21 year ago

          It’s there to let you know that your damn O2 sensor is on the fritz again.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        I’ll wait to pass judgement because, not being an expert, I have no idea what the standard procedure is for that warning appearing in 3 out of however many (hundreds of?) flights this plane engaged in over that period of time. With hindsight of course we can say “duh don’t fly the plane with the door about to blow off if it says it has pressurization issues” but maybe this is not actually a particularly serious warning in different circumstances.

        • methodicalaspect
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          If I’m not mistaken, the Alaska Airlines accident aircraft completed 99 flights, as it went into service only a couple months ago.

          Not an expert myself but I binge air crash investigation shows like nobody’s business, and this seems to speak to QC and maintenance workload/culture issues.