• Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    210
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The company said this did not represent a reversal of its previous stance, but rather the result of reconsidering how it interprets its existing policies.

    We’re not taking back what we said about how we wouldn’t kick Nazis off the platform… but we’re kicking Nazis off the platform.

    What a fucking laugh. Fuck Substack.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      521 year ago

      I agree, it’s a tiny step in the right direction, but definitely too little too late.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        661 year ago

        It’s not though, like they say themselves it’s only a reconsideration of the existing policies which is to maximize profit, morals be dammed. First they welcomed Nazis because Nazis gave them money and now they don’t because Nazis cause other people to stop giving them money. If Nazis wasn’t bad business nothing would have changed. This whole ordeal showed what kind of people they are.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          Plus, they can’t even admit they’re caving to public pressure. Ego-ridden Nazi sympathizers, weird how that keeps happening.

    • DigitalTraveler42
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      They’ll just do something similar to what Musk did on Shitter initially, pretend to kick them off and then quietly let them back on.

    • @Wrench
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      I miss interpreted the rrrrrules