I’m the chimney sweep now!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    we just moved child labour to less developed countries. we didn’t get rid of anything. you just don’t see it, but child labour is still going strong in the world. child slavery as well.

    • @RaoulDook
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      No WE did not. The people in those countries where it still happens allowed it to still happen.

      None of us have any decisionmaking power to control what those countries do, so the burden to fix those problems is on those countries who allow it.

      • Cowbee [he/they]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        It’s 100% a consequence of Capitalism, though. You’re blaming developing nations for the willful exploitation international Corporations commit and you personally benefit from.

        • @RaoulDook
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          That’s just your opinion. The fact is that those developing nations should have child labor laws in place, and proper enforcement of those laws to prevent children from being exploited. The blame belongs squarely on those who allow it, and I reject any personal responsibility for any of that because I have no control over the laws of any country.

            • @RaoulDook
              link
              English
              01 year ago

              I’m a bit older than that and have actually studied Macroeconomics at the undergraduate level. Have you?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Because a macroeconomics course is obviously going to be honest about this topic… Are you even serious?

          • Cowbee [he/they]
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            It is not my opinion that international corporations brutally exploit the third world, it’s a fact. It is also not my opinion that Capitalism leads to this, the profit motive inevitably leads to it.

            You claiming that developing nations should just fight against international corporations brutally exploiting them and absolving yourself of any responsibility you have for it is just sticking your head in the sand. If you aren’t boycotting Nestlé, you’re supporting them.

            The “good” news is that there is no ethical consumption under Capitalism. You individually cannot do much, except protect, organize, and try your best to support less unethical companies whenever you can. However, to blame developing countries for corporations knowingly brutally exploiting them and offering no alternative is absolutely baffling.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              The “good” news is that there is no ethical consumption under Capitalism.

              Such an absurd thing to say. I’m sure you’ll win lots of hearts and minds with your absolutist take 🙄

              • @Psychodelic
                link
                01 year ago

                Seriously! I mean, what if we only exploit a little bit of others’ labor? Isn’t that ok?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  Sure, and when nobody wants to be a farmer in your utopia, you aren’t going to “exploit” anybody to fix that problem right?

                • @SCB
                  link
                  01 year ago

                  I’m not exploiting you if we agree on a price for something.

              • Cowbee [he/they]
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                What a way to say absolutely nothing.

                If Capitalism is inherently exploitative, then there is no perfectly ethical form of it. Therefore, it should be replaced with a better system.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  Do you imagine there is a switch somewhere? Like, right now we’re “doing capitalism” and tomorrow we could flip the switch and do something else?

                  Everything exists on a spectrum, and you won’t find anything like “pure” capitalism anywhere.

                  Id also disagree with the premise of it being inherently exploitative, but that’s a different topic.

                  • Cowbee [he/they]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    21 year ago

                    No, I don’t think you can just turn on the Socialism, Communism, or Anarchism button and do those. That’s Utopianism. However, the idea that radical restructuring of society must be done via painfully slow iterative changes is also absurd and Utopian.

                    Capitalism is inherently exploitative, and that isn’t a different topic. Complaining about me saying that there’s no ethical consumption under Capitalism and yet saying you don’t want to talk about why that’s the case is just running away.

                    Capitalism is a bunch of mini-dictators competing, when we could have democratic and Cooperative control of industry instead.

              • @Psychodelic
                link
                11 year ago

                I was referring to the rejecting any personal responsibility spiel. lol. I love how far off you were though

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Yeah those countries just need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps and start being productive members of the world.

        I know we could help them out so they don’t have to go through all the hard times alone and without the knowledge we have, but fuck em hahahahahaha

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          But we are sharing knowledge and sending both aid and capital there. A lot of the countries are industrialized to the degree they are with the capital. Nobody acts in a vacuum these days.

          We could be doing more for sure but we’re not doing nothing.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            That literally has nothing to do with what I was making fun of that guy for. He was arguing we shouldn’t help at all. I was being sarcastic with him.

            I agree with what you’ve said

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          It’s a very complex issue, Western countries do a lot of things to help out less developed nations but we also do selfish things that makes life harder for them - unfortunately this is the reality of humanity, I am fighting my own personal ideological war against capitalism and the greed based system by which we live so I’m not defending it but it also has to be stated that other systems can have these flaws too.

          We need a cultural shift to fix these problems, an economic one isn’t enough on its own

        • @RaoulDook
          link
          English
          -21 year ago

          The fact is that those developing nations should have child labor laws in place, and proper enforcement of those laws to prevent children from being exploited. The blame belongs squarely on those who allow it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            What a strange take. You’re saying that if I, as a business owner, am fully aware that my production chain relies on slave or child labor in another country, I bear no moral responsibility because “well that country should have stopped it”?

            • @RaoulDook
              link
              English
              01 year ago

              I didn’t say any of that bullshit that you’re trying to imply that I said. Those are your words only.

              Comments like yours are a detriment to social media. Don’t try to put words in people’s mouths. That garbage is far too common and you just dumped yours here.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                That’s precisely what you said, it’s nobody’s responsibility but that country. I merely pointed out an obvious example where your statement is false. Work on your comprehension skills.

          • Uh huh, I bet you definitely have bought something that is connected to child labor. Now, STFU, fool.

            For the record, if you’re in the U.S., there are plenty of children being exploited right here.

            • @RaoulDook
              link
              English
              -31 year ago

              No you can shut the fuck up. You are getting a block shortly after you read this. You know it costs nothing to be polite instead of throwing around insults to people you disagree with.

              Don’t be a piece of shit. It’s not that hard.

              • @Psychodelic
                link
                -11 year ago

                How dare someone point out things I’m ignorant of and don’t understand as I make ridiculous claims about economic/foreign policy! Ohers have no right to criticize my unfounded, poorly-thought-out statements!!

                Seriously though, you’re totally not a fool. Imperialism and colonization are just buzzwords; they don’t actually mean anything, so you have nothing to worry about

                • @RaoulDook
                  link
                  English
                  -21 year ago

                  Funny how nobody wants to address the actual facts that I stated, that the burden of enforcing child labor laws is on the country that it happens in.

                  It doesn’t fucking matter at all though, because nobody reading any of this can do any goddamn thing about it, and it will continue regardless.

                  Enjoy your dose of realism for today.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        yes we do. we demand money and offer that the only way they can make it is by exploitation.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Not sure who the “we” in this situation is, but I’m not demanding anything from them. They’re selling shit and I’m buying. I’m not demanding products from them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -21 year ago

            I’m buying

            consumers are responsible for what they consume. pay and forget doesn’t work

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You said “we demand money”, that’s what I’m replying to. I (nor you in the comment I was replying to) didn’t say anything about responsibility.

        • @SCB
          link
          21 year ago

          we demand money and offer that the only way they can make it is by exploitation.

          This is the opposite of outsourcing labor.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            lets say america finds the cure for cancer, they only accept dollars. you have to get those dollars. welcome to the global trade.

            • @SCB
              link
              11 year ago

              None of this has anything to do with outsourcing labor other than that you’ll have way more dollars than if you were a subsistence farmer.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                outsourcing labor

                if americans are using their time to find the cure for cancer someone has to produce food, someone has to mine the copper, someone has to etc… exploitation, the outsourcing of exploitation is a given in a capitalist system. if you are a subsistence farmer no cure for cancer for you in a capitalist system.

    • @SCB
      link
      11 year ago

      Pretty hard to export child chimney sweeps to other countries