Donald Trump, the chief propagator of false “birther” claims first against then-President Barack Obama and later against Sen. Ted Cruz, has a new target: Nikki Haley.

As Haley surges in New Hampshire polling, Trump posted an article on his Truth Social account from a right-wing outlet that claimed Haley, his GOP rival, is ineligible to be president because her parents were not U.S. citizens when she was born.

Haley was born in South Carolina and has lived in the U.S. her entire life. Her parents were immigrants, who became citizens after her birth in 1972.

“The birther claims against Nikki Haley are totally baseless as a legal and constitutional matter,” Harvard Law School professor emeritus Laurence Tribe wrote in an email. “I can’t imagine what Trump hopes to gain by those claims unless it’s to play the race card against the former governor and UN ambassador as a woman of color — and to draw on the wellsprings of anti-immigrant prejudice by reminding everyone that Haley’s parents weren’t citizens when she was born in the USA.”

  • originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    8510 months ago

    the guys playbook is not very thick. and hes an lying idiot.

    par for this course.

    i dont understand how every media outlet that exists isnt broadcasting the words ‘trump lying again’ instead of this obfuscation they like to achieve that hides his misdeeds from the ignorant.

      • @Eldritch
        link
        English
        410 months ago

        You can’t manipulate the willing. Our media loves him and eats up the distraction. Well apart from those like Mehdi Hasan. Which is why he left.

    • @utopianfiat
      link
      English
      1010 months ago

      Honestly this is great though. The GOP should be bombarded with this fact for the entire primary, make sure Haley supporters never want to hold their nose in the general.

    • @Candelestine
      link
      English
      610 months ago

      As much as it irritates the contrarian in me, I do have to chalk this up to an honest criticism of capitalism in general. Since news corps have to pander to both advertisers and broad swaths of the public, who are often on the squeamish side when it comes to facts they themselves find unpleasant, big news corps are extremely limited in how they can present things.

      Generally viewer-funded news gets around this, in the US that’s things like PBS, NPR, Democracy Now and nowadays, Patreon supported content creators. Not that this system is without flaws or anything, but it’s significantly better in general.

      But look at it this way: They’re selling a product, in an environment swarming with competition, and their costs are very high. So they’re going to lean into the biggest markets they can. The kind that eat too much McDonalds and watch reality tv and don’t vote. Naturally, those folks don’t like their analysis to be too hard-hitting, otherwise it’d be routinely, roundaboutly implying they’re fat, stupid and lazy. Saying that to your customers is rather counterproductive, no matter how true it is.

      I’d be reluctant to speak so openly about it myself, except there’s not really many of them on here. They’re mostly all on facebook, twitter and reddit still. Y’know, the lazy options.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      His playbook is scrawled in crayon on the back of an Applebee’s kids menu. It just reads “whenever I do something bad, make up a story about the other side doing it”