• @spittingimage
    link
    English
    310 months ago

    Why does it need to be consistent? I think it’s fine to say I’m emotionally attached to this animal but not that one.

    • @sizzler
      link
      English
      -310 months ago

      This TYPE of animal. It makes no sense. Either you are for animals or you don’t care about them.

      • @spittingimage
        link
        English
        210 months ago

        That’s absurdly reductionist. All animals are not alike.

        • @sizzler
          link
          English
          310 months ago

          You say I’m absurdly reductionist then follow up with an absurd reductionist statement like “all animals are not alike” Your cognitive dissonance is amazing.

          • @spittingimage
            link
            English
            010 months ago

            You don’t know what reductionist means, do you.

        • @sizzler
          link
          English
          210 months ago

          Brown recluse maybe, your type of comment is the person who tries to eat it…

      • @DillyDaily
        link
        English
        -110 months ago

        What if someone were to say “I care about all mammals” but they continued to eat fish and poultry?

        At least that’s consistent.

        • @sizzler
          link
          English
          210 months ago

          Fair enough.