• AlwaysNowNeverNotMe
    link
    fedilink
    5311 months ago

    Moderators are incompetent hacks with no political knowledge.

    They should have a panel of the top general, most recent american economic Nobel laureate (or some equivalent), most recently retired surgeon general and attorneys general write the questions which are then presented by a moderator, then the author of each question responds to their answers and if required asks a single follow up question to each debator.

    • @Evilcoleslaw
      link
      49
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      More importantly, if the candidates are non-responsive they should shut off their fucking microphones.

      • @SinningStromgald
        link
        13
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        And when it isn’t their turn shut off their mics. The only hot mics should be the moderators and the candidate being addressed by the moderators.

    • @robotemojiOP
      link
      1311 months ago

      I think this is a great point. All the moderators are media personalities without a background so they can’t really claim expert knowledge on the issues. But the panel of experts I think is spot on to create this basis of expertise or fact. The single follow up used to be the norm. e.g. “candidates have 2 minute responses with a 30 second follow up” (strictly adhered to time)

    • Uranium3006
      link
      fedilink
      811 months ago

      also give them the authority to mute a candidate’s mic for breaking rules, like talking over someone else when they don’t have the floor. perhaps you can have a separate umpire type character. record what’s going in the mic and release it 7 days later for transparency but don’t let it get messy