When it comes to spreading disinformation about climate change or the risks of smoking, I can clearly see how it protects economic interests (e.g. the value of the assets of the fossil fuel industry or the tobacco industry). I therefore understand that these lies are (have been) regularly pushed by people who do not necessarily believe in them.
But what are the strategic considerations behind the active spread of anti-vax theories? Who gains from this? Is it just an effective topic to rile up a political base? Because it hits people right in the feels? Is it just a way to bring people together on one topic, in order to use that political base for other purposes?
Or is anti-vax disinformation really only pushed by people who believe it?
It’s a fight against establishment and governments. Sometimes it swings one way, other times the other way.
Plus if one side of the political spectrum fights for something, then the other side needs to fight for the opposite. Simple as that.
(And the more one side pushes, the more will the other side push back. Action and reaction.)