• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    28
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I know this will likely upset many Dems but:

    Dems have the Senate and the Presidency and are completely within their power to pack the Supreme Court and basically alter all of the terrible rulings the Supreme Court has made lately. The problem is that many Dems do not think it is worth packing the court for women, students, or the environment. You can’t just vote your way out of this as you would literally have to pack up and move to West Virginia to vote for a Senator who would be ultimately determining this.

    The system is ultimately flawed and just voting isn’t enough.

    Addition after some research:

    It looks like the Supreme Court is set in size by law and FDR had some of the same problems so it would be likely that this would take an act of congress and not just the Senate.

    Ultimately I feel this is certainly more difficult and makes my criticism of inaction now invalid as Dems do not hold enough of a majority to pass legislation; however I do still see them as responsible for inaction when majorities have been held throughout my lifetime.

    • @LeZero
      link
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      A) They need 50 senators willing to entertain that notion. They only have 49. B) If there were one action that I think would be most likely to kick off Civil War 2, it would be packing the court.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        That’s a very selective way of saying the Dems aren’t responsible because Dems wont support students, the environment, or women’s rights.

      • Hot Saucerman
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Civil War 2 is already happening, you must not be paying attention.

        It’s time to rip off the fucking band-aid and do something about it instead of letting the Proud Boys, the Three Percenters, and others run around terrorizing the country through wanton violence and death.

    • Lexi Sneptaur
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      With that being said, you’re also correct that voting is NOT enough. Protesting and direct action, mutual aid, and more are all required!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      Wouldn’t the Rs just do the same thing next time they have power? I get what you’re saying, but isn’t setting that precedent dangerous?

      • Hot Saucerman
        link
        fedilink
        16
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re saying that as if the Rs won’t do the same thing anyway without prior provocation. They’ve literally already broken the law to pack the court and the Democrats sat on their hands. They denied Obama picking a justice because it was “too close to an election” when the election was like six months away, but let Trump pick one when an election was already underway.

        Take off the fucking blinders, the Republicans already do these kind of things.

        They already set the precedent, motherfucker.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        131 year ago

        Republicans are channeling full fucking fascism and you think the only thing keeping them from packing the already packed republican court is because Dems haven’t done it first?

      • riseuppikmin[he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes- the court is an illegitimate anti-democratic institution and the long-term goal should be its abolishment.

        It is the final tool of the American oligarchs to prevent needed structural change in the country.

        Anything to highlight this is a good thing. Playing ping-pong with court expansion would be great to accelerate its necessary demise.

      • OrangeSlice
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        R’s don’t care about precedent. That’s why they actually get what they want. If Democrats actually got things done, they would consistently win elections and it would be be an issue anyway.

        It’s not going to happen anyway, though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Yeah 3 million fewer votes too. Just vote your way out of an oligarchy guys! The ruling class totally will let you and wont gerrymander or make constitutional amendments to give term limits to only Presidents…

    • Lexi Sneptaur
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      They are not completely within their power to pack the court, sadly. They would have done so already if this were the case. They need 60 in the senate as well as a majority in the house and the presidency. Then they could.

      • Hot Saucerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I like how when Democrats are in power, they’re unable to do anything…

        But when Republicans are in power, they break the law at lightning speed, do things they’re not supposed to do, and nobody stops them because actually the only thing staying in their way are “rules” and “decorum” and not “laws” and yet mysteriously the Democrats are always beholden to “laws” that prevent them from doing the same. Also it seems like Democrats hands are tied at actually bringing criminal charges against Republicans because that would be “partisan.”[1] Just look at how they’ve slow-walked Trump’s prosecution and only went for it when it became clear he would never comply.

        It’s a fucking farce.


        1. https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/19/politics/fbi-doj-trump-investigation-january-6/index.html ↩︎

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -11 year ago

      Of course it upsets the Dems knowing that they’re on the only side that has to govern well and we honest.

      But the alternative is for our side to be as much of a malignant tumor on the country as the other side is.

      I’ll take this version of the Democratic party, despite the fact the Republicans are trying to destroy the US and rebuild it in their own image.

        • Hot Saucerman
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t side with oligarchs.

          Joe Manchin sure does. Nancy Pelosi sure does. Chuck Schumer sure does.

          Oopsie poopsie.

          EDIT: I triggered some Democrats by reminding them that the same hands that feed the Republicans feed the Democrats, apparently. Get over yourselves.

          In Nancy’s Own Fucking Words