• Chozo
    link
    fedilink
    -811 months ago

    I’m not sure how being unrelated to a separate event which wasn’t mentioned or referenced at all in the headline makes it clickbait.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      15
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The picture is a Boeing.

      And this would never be a headline if not for the other story.

      • Chozo
        link
        fedilink
        -911 months ago

        I don’t think the average person can identify the difference between a Boeing or an Airbus. It’s clearly a stock photo and isn’t meant to represent the actual plane from the story, either way.

        “Bad reporting” I’d agree with, but “clickbait” not so much.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          That’s like reporting on Teslas catching fire after a bender but using a photo of a Jeep Wrangler. They’re 2 entirely separate aircraft and should be treated as such.

          • Chozo
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I’m pretty sure the average person can tell the difference between a Tesla and a Jeep, though.

            It doesn’t matter, anyway. It’s not a part of the story.

    • @Everythingispenguins
      link
      511 months ago

      Because it feeds off of fear. A319 are not Boeing and they don’t have plug doors. This story wouldn’t have made the news a week ago. The likelihood of this being anything other than just a sensor error is low.