• partial_accumen
    link
    459 months ago

    This is a total clickbait story. Don’t bother.

    Here’s the one relevant piece of info:

    “The plane involved was an Airbus A319.”

    This plane has no relation to the Boeing Max 9 in the headlines. The problem on this Airbus A319 wasn’t a plug door issue like the Max 9. Total clickbait.

    • Chozo
      link
      fedilink
      -89 months ago

      I’m not sure how being unrelated to a separate event which wasn’t mentioned or referenced at all in the headline makes it clickbait.

        • Chozo
          link
          fedilink
          -99 months ago

          I don’t think the average person can identify the difference between a Boeing or an Airbus. It’s clearly a stock photo and isn’t meant to represent the actual plane from the story, either way.

          “Bad reporting” I’d agree with, but “clickbait” not so much.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            That’s like reporting on Teslas catching fire after a bender but using a photo of a Jeep Wrangler. They’re 2 entirely separate aircraft and should be treated as such.

            • Chozo
              link
              fedilink
              0
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I’m pretty sure the average person can tell the difference between a Tesla and a Jeep, though.

              It doesn’t matter, anyway. It’s not a part of the story.

      • @Everythingispenguins
        link
        59 months ago

        Because it feeds off of fear. A319 are not Boeing and they don’t have plug doors. This story wouldn’t have made the news a week ago. The likelihood of this being anything other than just a sensor error is low.