I’m politically agnostic and have moved from a slightly conservative stance to a vastly more progressive stance (european). i still dont get the more niche things like tankies and anarchists at this point but I would like to, without spending 10 hours reading endless manifests (which do have merit, no doubt, but still).
Can someone explain to me why anarchy isnt the guy (or gal, or gang, or entity) with the bigger stick making the rules?
That sounds very… infeasible as a society.
There are and have been a number of anarchist communities. It is feasible, but I agree that in our current globalized world state it is hard to imagine for anything bigger than a village to survive for long.