The court is a sham at this point. Damn near every ruling these days is a party line vote and it’s disappointing. Why even haven them hear cases if we already know the outcome?
The odd thing is that when they do agree, they still get it wrong: their ruling against faithless electors was unanimous, but in their statements they justify the decision by saying that if they ruled based on the text there would be chaos. Folks, that’s not your job. If the constitution needs to be fixed it needs to be fixed through proper channels. You don’t get to decide something is constitutional (or not) just because you like it (or not).
The court is a sham at this point. Damn near every ruling these days is a party line vote and it’s disappointing. Why even haven them hear cases if we already know the outcome?
The odd thing is that when they do agree, they still get it wrong: their ruling against faithless electors was unanimous, but in their statements they justify the decision by saying that if they ruled based on the text there would be chaos. Folks, that’s not your job. If the constitution needs to be fixed it needs to be fixed through proper channels. You don’t get to decide something is constitutional (or not) just because you like it (or not).
Exactly! That’s what they have been doing lately and it pisses me off.
I wish we’d stop complaining that SCOTUS judges have opinions, because they do, and they will along party lines.
So we have to elect judges that don’t think the only non-dirtball people worthy of dignity, are hedge fund owners.