• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1311 months ago

    Still ignoring context. But that’s fine, because any article critical is Israel is obviously written in bad faith, huh?

    Whatever. If suggest touching grass, but that’d probably be toxic for the grass, and the environment is already messed up enough already…

    • Ooops
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      So then tell me about that context…

      “I don’t want to hear it, so you most be toxic” isn’t context. That’s just you being part of the team “Cheerleading for terrorism”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -111 months ago

        Says the guy cheerleading genocide committed by an authoritarian regime. Why do you even care that I, a complete stranger, an critical of their actions? If you’re so confident in “your” conclusions, why would you be threatened by somebody whose life as literally no chance of affecting you?

        As much as I want to believe words exist to knock some sense into you, I give up. (Anyone else wanna bet how long he sits and fumes about my refusal to abandon my beliefs to replace them with the party line? Probably spent the entire day between my response and his angrily trying to come up with the perfect rebuttal.)

        Go ahead buddy, scream into the wind. You ain’t got anything to say worth listening for…

        • Ooops
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Says the guy cheerleading genocide committed by an authoritarian regime.

          Problem is I didn’t. I called out bad journalism. Because bullshit narratives and tribalism make any actual discussion meaningless.

          But then your see something that is seemingly criticising “your team” and instantly your delusions get triggered and you hallucinate how I “cheerlead for genocide” when I did actually not say anything other than that this report is polemic low quality bullshit.