I’m politically agnostic and have moved from a slightly conservative stance to a vastly more progressive stance (european). i still dont get the more niche things like tankies and anarchists at this point but I would like to, without spending 10 hours reading endless manifests (which do have merit, no doubt, but still).
Can someone explain to me why anarchy isnt the guy (or gal, or gang, or entity) with the bigger stick making the rules?
Supposidly everyone is equal and work collectivly to prevent others from building a big stick monopoly. Unfortunayly humans will take risks and self organise entropy deems it so. People will self organise into a traditional power structure due its increased efficiency at persuring a singular goal. People will always break the rules regardless and given enough time and number off attempts someone will eventualy invent the biggest stick regardless of if its illegal at which point the rules nolonger matter.