seahorse [Ohio]M to [email protected]English • 10 months agoOofmidwest.socialimagemessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1518arrow-down138
arrow-up1480arrow-down1imageOofmidwest.socialseahorse [Ohio]M to [email protected]English • 10 months agomessage-square45fedilink
minus-square@Cold_Brew_Enemalink30•10 months agoLooking back, it is really weird. Do they still do “one nation, under god?” As someone who is no longer religious at all, I find this weird, too.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink39•10 months agoIt wasn’t always like that, either. The “under god” part was added by Eisenhower in the 50s during the red scare. He added the “In God We Trust” thing to the money around the same time.
minus-squarePorkRolllink7•10 months agoShouldn’t this upset Christians, then? To use the Lord’s name in vain against communism?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•10 months agoWhen it involves money, Christians are pretty hypocrite
Looking back, it is really weird. Do they still do “one nation, under god?” As someone who is no longer religious at all, I find this weird, too.
It wasn’t always like that, either. The “under god” part was added by Eisenhower in the 50s during the red scare. He added the “In God We Trust” thing to the money around the same time.
Shouldn’t this upset Christians, then? To use the Lord’s name in vain against communism?
When it involves money, Christians are pretty hypocrite