• @S_204
    link
    411 year ago

    Consider this in the context of a required service.

    What if the doctor refused service because you were queer? How about lawyers?

    Cakes and web design are used as the examples to make the problem seem less severe. It can and will extend much farther than what this ruling is based on.

    • @danc4498
      link
      01 year ago

      But those are wildly different types of services. Are you saying that this court case makes it so that doctors can refuse service to homosexuals now?

      It was my understanding that the nature of the business (ie, not a required service) and amount of available alternatives was a factor into why they should be allowed to refuse service.

      • @WetBeardHairs
        link
        11 year ago

        It’s just an example of a necessary service. Keep in mind, many of those service providers require a decade of education, professional experience, and licensure before being allowed to practice. Sure, a website designer can say “nuh uh” and you can go on living. But if a doctor or lawyer, both necessary and in short supply, both say “nuh uh” then you could literally wind up dead or in jail.