The Pentagon has its eye on the leading AI company, which this week softened its ban on military use.

  • @camelCaseGuy
    link
    English
    -1711 months ago

    I don’t understand that point of view? Why would they pay their CEOs less than any other company? If they did, then they would either not be able to hire CEOs, have the shittiest CEOs or have CEOs that wouldn’t give a crap. People don’t live on welfare, especially highly connected, highly educated people like CEOs.

    • @grepe
      link
      English
      21
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Why do you think lower paid CEO must be shitty? There turns out to be very little link between the CEO and CEO pay and the company performance… they are only paid a lot cause they are in the position of power to directly influence their salary.

        • @grepe
          link
          English
          111 months ago

          Actually, I do… but do you really want the source or do you just want me to be wrong?

          • @Imalostmerchant
            link
            English
            311 months ago

            I would like to read more. Sorry if asking for a source made me sound closed minded.

      • @uranibaba
        link
        English
        -211 months ago

        they are only paid a lot cause they are in the position of power to directly influence their salary.

        And not because they have a much higher responsibility? As a CEO, it is your job to make sure a company makes a profit (unless you are a nonprofit, I guess you have some other goal you need to achieve). That is what you a pay a CEO to do. I assume you would pay more for someone who is able to turn a higher profit.