Apple to Remove Blood-Oxygen Sensor From Watch to Avoid U.S. Ban::Tech giant’s withdrawal of technology may end cloud hanging over $18 billion smartwatch business

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    Based on the article and other comments about the dispute, it seems like a justified legal move, but I hope they come around to an agreement regarding existing devices, rather than something insane, such as disabling the functionality on existing consumer devices.

    I was given an Apple Watch in 2017. I replaced that (functioning just fine) watch about a year ago with a model with a pulse oximeter, specifically because I wanted the feature.

    • @BaronVonBort
      link
      English
      211 year ago

      “What should we do? Just PAY the developer for the feature? Nah, we’ll just continue to file lawsuits and eventually settle in the inevitable class action from buyers which will certainly not be more than what we would have spent just licensing it in the first place”

      Look, I’m not one for patent trolling, but this is pretty blatant on Apple’s end and as a Series 9 owner it’s annoying because it’s a feature I upgraded for that I’ll lose access to just because they don’t want to be told they’re wrong. Such corporate bullshit.

    • @RunningInRVA
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      They couldn’t do that without somehow compensating you. Not saying that is better but they can’t cripple a product that you have paid for.

      • @dynamojoe
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        That will end up as a class action lawsuit with some merit. There will be a race to file this one.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Won’t get much back though. It’ll be a small refund based on the cost of the feature relative to the overall purchase price.