Apple to Remove Blood-Oxygen Sensor From Watch to Avoid U.S. Ban::Tech giant’s withdrawal of technology may end cloud hanging over $18 billion smartwatch business

  • Uglyhead
    link
    English
    39
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    A decision on Apple’s request for a permanent stay on the U.S. ban during its appeal is expected in the coming days.

    An Apple spokeswoman said that the blood-oxygen feature would continue to be available on the watches for now.

    Still at the maybe maybe maybe stage.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1510 months ago

      Based on the article and other comments about the dispute, it seems like a justified legal move, but I hope they come around to an agreement regarding existing devices, rather than something insane, such as disabling the functionality on existing consumer devices.

      I was given an Apple Watch in 2017. I replaced that (functioning just fine) watch about a year ago with a model with a pulse oximeter, specifically because I wanted the feature.

      • @BaronVonBort
        link
        English
        2110 months ago

        “What should we do? Just PAY the developer for the feature? Nah, we’ll just continue to file lawsuits and eventually settle in the inevitable class action from buyers which will certainly not be more than what we would have spent just licensing it in the first place”

        Look, I’m not one for patent trolling, but this is pretty blatant on Apple’s end and as a Series 9 owner it’s annoying because it’s a feature I upgraded for that I’ll lose access to just because they don’t want to be told they’re wrong. Such corporate bullshit.

      • @RunningInRVA
        link
        English
        410 months ago

        They couldn’t do that without somehow compensating you. Not saying that is better but they can’t cripple a product that you have paid for.

        • @dynamojoe
          link
          English
          510 months ago

          That will end up as a class action lawsuit with some merit. There will be a race to file this one.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            610 months ago

            Won’t get much back though. It’ll be a small refund based on the cost of the feature relative to the overall purchase price.

  • @saywhatisabigw
    link
    English
    1810 months ago

    What about all the customers who bought it for that feature?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Well, Apple stole a patent after they were presented with it when they lied about wanting to do a "collaboration ". Then literally GUTTED their engineering team with crazy sign on bonuses while using what they saw from that meeting and bypass their “collaboration”.

      I agree that patents suck IF there was no end date. But I’m totally ok with Apple getting in trouble for blatantly doing something like this.

      Fuck Apple. They deserve this and more for being fucking too big to get in trouble.

      • @MeanEYE
        link
        English
        5210 months ago

        Also let us not forget that Apple sued other phone manufacturers for having rectangular phones. You reap what you sow.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4010 months ago

          Also they tried to trademark the word “App” Store saying that “App Store” meant “Apple” Store.

          Fuck Apple.

          • @MeanEYE
            link
            English
            1310 months ago

            Yup. They care about money and monopoly as it also means more money.

            • @Plopp
              link
              English
              510 months ago

              All companies do. Any company that says they want a free market is lying or speaking from a place of disadvantage - they all would want a monopoly even more, preferably one where people are mandated by the government to buy their product. Or even better, if the government is the customer. $$$$$

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                310 months ago

                Most tech companies on the stock market.

                Plenty of mom and pop shops and 1 man websites that everyone should support.

                • @Plopp
                  link
                  English
                  110 months ago

                  Yes, of course, good distinction. I had stock market companies in mind.

      • @TORFdot0
        link
        English
        1510 months ago

        Seriously, just pay the licensing fee to the patent holder. For as much as their customers have paid them over the years, they can afford it.

    • Daniel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1210 months ago

      You’re getting downvoted a lot, but honestly you’re right. The fact that corporations are arguing over who gets to use technology that could help people with, or could have, medical conditions is really depressing. I get that an Apple Match isn’t going to be that accurate, but it could still be a sign that something is off.

      Technology could help people, but I guess this is why we can’t have nice things.