• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2510 months ago

    vast majority of people use the default app their phone choice comes with.

    historically eise, the reason EU uses whatsapp was that there was a time period early on where sms costed money, so people used whatsapp to circumvent that. the U.S didnt have that problem as sms was free for the majority of people in that time period.

    • @echo64
      link
      English
      2310 months ago

      This seems a bit revisionist. Everyone had an amount of smses per month that were free in their contract.

      People switched to whatsapp because it was better than sms.

      • Natanael
        link
        fedilink
        English
        710 months ago

        Not everybody, and not infinitely far back. There was definitely a period where there were no free texts included (although I do think that by the iPhone introduction many did have it, but still not all!)

        • @echo64
          link
          English
          110 months ago

          its good to be clear that we are talking about a time period when people migrated to whatapp, and the reasoning for migrating to whatsapp. and how the ‘text for free’ thing wasn’t a big motivator, (nor was it a new idea)

      • lemmyvore
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 months ago

        And also because Whatsapp was available on every platform, from the dominant ones at the time (Nokia and Blackberry) to the newcomers (iOS, Android, even Windows Phone and more obscure ones like Samsung’s whatever it was called).

      • @Stupidmanager
        link
        English
        110 months ago

        wasn’t it the long distance thing? charged for sending SMS outside of your network or something. I recall whatsapp was the way to text your parents from one country in to another, even in the EU.

        I know for a fact my fam adopted almost a decade ago, so we can text from USA to EU to SA to Canada. Family all over and it’s free.

    • WhiteHotaru
      link
      fedilink
      English
      710 months ago

      39 cents/SMS. I remember this time. This does not explain why it has to be that specific protocol, though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        because people were already uaing sms when it was paid beforehand before smartphones were a thing. people just used to whatever the default was, especially since its not like everyone switched to a smart phone immediately after the iphone 3gs’ relase. sms was the default method to talk to people who were still using “dumbphones”

    • gregorum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 months ago

      Also, at the time, WhatsApp was pretty much the only option. Nowadays, there are a lot of other options.

      • @Zak
        link
        English
        210 months ago

        A part of it was that they put in the effort to support featurephones. People with smartphones always had other options.

        • lemmyvore
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          It was the other way around, the feature phones were funny at the time so not supporting them would have made no sense. And iPhones and Androids had just been launched at the time so there weren’t actually lots of options for them.

          • @Zak
            link
            English
            110 months ago

            WhatsApp was available for Blackberry, Symbian, and Nokia Series 40, and I’ve seen device support cited as an important part of its early success. It actually looks like Skype, AIM, and ICQ had pretty good support for various devices in the early 2010s too so I’m not sure that claim holds up.