• FuglyDuck
    link
    English
    310 months ago

    Okay, you have the president pull out all the stops, including ones of ambiguous legality, to stop supply of aid to Israel. Most voters are opposed and raise an outcry. Congress overrides his limited authority and restores aid, and now the opposition party wins the upcoming election. They send even more aid to Israel’s genocide.

    Wanna explain to me how that’s a better outcome?

    the most recent aid package, so to speak, was Biden acting unilaterally to send more arms. this was entirely unnecessary. You’re right that he can’t (and shouldn’t) go against congress in terms of funding.

    Doesn’t mean he needs to go around them to get them even more weapons. Doesn’t mean he needs to be pledging unconditional aid. Doesn’t mean he needs to be asking for aid from congress. And aiding Israel doesn’t necessarily mean we have to send munitions and other military hardware, either. they have one of the strongest militaries in the world- thanks to that long history of receiving our aid. one of if not the strongest military in the region.

    We don’t need to be supporting genocide. We do, however, need a president with enough moral integrity to say that.

    • PugJesus
      link
      fedilink
      010 months ago

      It sounds like we’re not actually in disagreement on principles, but arguing over what measures are acceptable in acknowledging the overwhelming popular and political support for continued Israeli aid.

      I agree entirely that Biden speeding up arms sales was entirely unnecessary and reflective of his generally pro-Israel position, which is… not good, to say the least.