Changes to the requirements for donating blood coupled with the pandemic have led to a drop-off in the number of teens and young adults donating blood.

It was a white T-shirt bearing the likeness of Snoopy wearing shades and leaning effortlessly against the iconic American Red Cross logo that prompted a surge in blood donations in the spring of 2023.

“Be cool. Give blood,” the shirt urged. The message — on young people, anyway — was effective. More than 70,000 people under age 35 responded to the call, rolling up their sleeves and giving blood in exchange for the coveted tees.

The need for blood is urgent. Over the holidays, the Red Cross had 7,000 fewer units of blood available than were needed by hospitals, said Dr. Eric Gehrie, the executive medical director of the American Red Cross. The organization speculated it would need about 8,000 additional donations every week in January to ensure that hospitals are fully supplied, he added.

  • Pons_Aelius
    link
    fedilink
    811 year ago

    I know it is bad but i completely understand why.

    A group of people who cannot afford health care and are at risk of crippling debt from medical issues are reluctant to donate blood.

      • Pons_Aelius
        link
        fedilink
        651 year ago

        Exactly.

        Scenario: A person regularly donates blood for years and receives no benefit from it.

        Later they need to receive transfusions due to surgery or medical emergency.

        They are charged several thousand dollars for the transfusions, the same amount as a person who has never donated.

        What is their motivation to donate again?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          I wonder if the same trend exists here in the UK or other countries with national health service.

          I must say paying people to give blood seems like a horrible idea, it incentivizers people with reasons not to give blood such as illness or drug use to lie. Sadly testing and screening isn’t very effective so it would likely cause problems.

          • Pons_Aelius
            link
            fedilink
            141 year ago

            I’m from a country with universal health care that is paid via a tax levy that all pay.

            We are not paid to donate but we are also provided transfusions for no charge as well.

            We do not have the issues mentioned in this article.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            211 months ago

            We (India) have free healthcare for the poor and subsidised healthcare for everyone else. Blood will therefore be free / discounted at a government hospital, but private hospitals can charge money. Donors must not be paid (including gifts, coupons, etc.) in either case, but some hospitals give a card or token saying you get priority if you ever need blood at that hospital.

          • Pons_Aelius
            link
            fedilink
            8
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yes, the warm glow of altruistic service to the community is a strong one but it is often hard to maintain in the face of looming bankruptcy due to medical debt.

        • @Crashumbc
          link
          English
          -11 year ago

          Did that change? At one time if you donated blood, you didn’t charge if you later needed blood…

          • @doingless
            link
            English
            51 year ago

            Yeah that isn’t a thing now. I’ve never heard of it. Was that like the '60s?

    • @CosmoNova
      link
      English
      171 year ago

      We have also been taught that everything comes at a price and everything is a product. Even ourselves. I can see why being asked to give away something for free in this context just seems bizarre, as necessary as it is.