• Canadian_Cabinet
    link
    fedilink
    3110 months ago

    Two years ago I made the switch to AMD when I needed to replace my ageing 1060 (still on Windows back then) and I’m so glad I did because I avoid all of the headaches with getting Nvidia to work on Linux

    • yeehaw
      link
      fedilink
      910 months ago

      Mine works fine. Never did check which drivers I’m using though. I like the cuda cores for davinci resolve, and dlss for games that struggle on my ultra wide monitor (looking at you, cyberpunk)

      If it wasn’t for those 2 things I will be gone next card refresh. Truthfully the main reason I went Nvidia in the first place was old habits. ATI/AMD traditionally had no driver support for Linux, or at least worse than Nvidia who actually had an official driver package. Things have changed though.

      • @Darorad
        link
        210 months ago

        For replacing dlss, fsr works well and you can use it on games that don’t support it using gamescope.

        • yeehaw
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          What is gamescope? Is fsr the same idea? Dynamic resolution scaling?

          • @Darorad
            link
            210 months ago

            Gamescope’s a compositor made by valve that you can install and add as a launch argument to games. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Gamescope

            Yeah, fsr’s basically the same thing as dlss, it’s a bit worse but it’s pretty close. You can also use it on nvdia cards.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              210 months ago

              If a game comes with FSR out of the box use that tho. It will not scale stuff like the UI for instance, so you get the UI at native resolution, but the game is getting upscaled. If you use Gamescope for scaling it will scale the whole image and it’s limited to FSR1 while games can come with FSR2 or even 3 (I think 3 is just added frame generation on top which is only useful for playing at >60fps).